Inspired by the VForVendetta monologue, I wrote this for my profile on {{Facebook}}: #QUOTE#Observe! An oaf of October who obeys no official, omnipotent, or even ordinary organism or orthodox otherworldly one; he is his own. Obdurate yet open, and always objective in opinion, he objects to the obnoxiously obtrusive oblivious, as is his onus. Occasionally objectionable, offensive, outlandish, or obscene; often outspoken, organized, and occupied; but not obtuse, odious, or onerous. Outgoing? The opposite; he is an outcast, ostracized outright. He oppresses his orneriness to avoid offending, an optimal obligation, and he aims to obliterate the outrage of his orientation. Obviously there are omissions in this opus, but he opposes the option to orate obsessively. Odd, and a bit off, his true self is obscured, hidden in the oblivion whose origin is the outset of his observations. We ought to end these occurrences of "O", for we are oscillating between original and old. The only other option, which I offer you now and you ought accept, if only once, is to call him Owen. Okay? Now out with you.

Simple to see sir, the self-aggrandizing of your statement sounds suspicion by cynics. The persona you've pedantically perpetrated portrays you as person of pronounced perception, nothing short of nearing Nietzsche. Never mind the noticeable narcissistic nature of your notice. These attributes you aim for, as any animate object would see are surely for someone seeking serious self-sufficiency. Don't dilly-dally with definition but declare yourself Daedalean in your determinant to duly determine your denotation... Yeah okay I totally had to look up most of those words an admittedly the OPs is better.